Home > News > Web
Marketing Breaking News
Web Marketing Breaking News
Microsoft's next target--Google?
By Jim Hu and Mike Ricciuti
CNET News.com
Posted on June 25, 2003, 5:09 AM PT
Microsoft's path to expand the Windows empire is leading directly to search king Google.
The software company this month quietly launched a
new search program called MSNBot, which scours the Web to build an index
of HTML links and documents. The homegrown system--which performs robot
functions previously left to Inktomi and other partners--may pose a significant
threat to Google if Microsoft fulfills its promise to make the program
a cornerstone of its overall PC and services strategies.
MSNBot is believed to be the first step in a multiyear
plan to build new search technology that bridges Microsoft's home and
business customers. Company executives hope the program will eventually
prove to be the elusive technology that binds its various Web sites, applications
and, of course, the dominant Windows operating system.
Microsoft could then connect the search engine of its
MSN portal to new file technology planned for the next version of Windows,
code-named Longhorn, which will make it easier to search e-mail, spreadsheets
and documents on PCs, corporate networks and the Web. The result would
be a powerful technology reaching from the desktop to the greater Internet
that could displace Google as the Web's leading search engine.
"What Google has done in terms of doing a great
end-user experience has led us to basically go back and redouble our efforts,"
Microsoft Vice President Yusuf Mehdi, who oversees the MSN division, said
at a conference held by investment bank Goldman Sachs last month. "We
are investing a lot to build what we expect and hope will be the best-in-class
search service in the near future."
The move begs obvious comparisons to earlier Microsoft campaigns, including the infamous undoing of Netscape Communications in
the browser market. But Microsoft is not trying to unseat a leading rival
simply to catch up with a market it had underestimated, as it has in previous
battles. The company would be moving in its current direction even without
the presence of Google, because search is expected to evolve into a pivotal
part of its business.
Nevertheless, Microsoft may use some familiar tactics
in the search market, most notably by integrating and distributing the
technology throughout its many products and services. The company could,
for example, embed connections to related Microsoft search and mapping
functions directly into Word documents or Web sites built with Windows
development tools.
The goal is vintage Microsoft: Keep customers within
the Windows universe; build demand through popular functions such as search;
and bypass the need for services from competitors. This strategy, in theory,
will give consumers more incentive to buy Windows software and use Microsoft
services, while taking away revenue that Google receives for search results.
"The fact that Longhorn is on the horizon raises
questions to whether search services will be integrated into the Longhorn
experience and what the ramifications will be to other folks," said
Michael Gartenberg, an industry analyst at Jupiter Research. "Microsoft
has long demonstrated they don't have to be best at something, but they
have to be good enough for people to use their default settings."
The search initiative is part of a broader Microsoft
plan to revamp all of its major product lines, including Windows, MSN,
the Office package of business applications, and server software. It is
a key business strategy with a mission that's as unwieldy as its name,
"Longhorn Wave Innovation."
Stirring up search
The value Microsoft places on search became apparent more than a year
ago when the company began outlining plans for Longhorn, which is scheduled
to debut in 2005. The operating system will include a central engine that
can search a PC's morass of Word documents, Outlook e-mailings, Excel
spreadsheets and PDF (portable document format) files with a single tool--a
function that has escaped the PC industry, and Microsoft in particular,
for decades.
"Microsoft's target will be to create little perceived
difference between Web search and local search," said Chris LeTocq,
an analyst at Guernsey Research.
Neither Google nor Microsoft made executives available
for this report. However, in a recent interview with The Seattle Times,
Microsoft executive Jim Allchin said condescendingly: "Google's a
very nice system, but compared to my vision, it's pathetic."
Google, for its part, may have to make some critical
decisions to avoid a fate similar to that suffered by other Microsoft
victims, which have been forced out of their core businesses and into
unfamiliar territories. Pressure from Microsoft pushed browser maker Netscape
to the Web portal market, for instance, and RealNetworks from media players
to subscription content services.
"The big question is: Will Google turn into a
portal?" said Matthew Berk, an analyst with Jupiter Research. "The
truth of the matter is, they have no idea. They see one market and go
after it. They build things literally one day at a time."
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer stressed the role of search
in the company's strategies as part of an all-hands memo sent to Microsoft
employees this month. In discussing new products and marketing related
to Longhorn, Ballmer identified search as one area where Microsoft will
offer "new end-user functionality and services." As part of
his "integrated innovation" message, he said the company needs
to "reach out broadly" through search, consumer services and
other avenues to grow.
The need for diversity is well warranted. Although
Microsoft has more than $40 billion in cash reserves, it has long depended
primarily on two products, Windows and Office, to generate the bulk of
its profits. The company has had mixed results at best in repeated attempts
to establish MSN as a money-making consumer venture, but the company believes
that more capable search services may be the key to the portal's success.
The business of commercial search has become a cash
windfall not only for Google and rival Overture Services, but also for
partners such as MSN, America Online and Yahoo. Google and Overture share
revenues with their distribution partners every time someone clicks on
a sponsored link. But Google's advantage over Overture stems from its
role as a commercial search provider and a highly trafficked engine, allowing
it to receive higher margins while decreasing its reliance on portal partners--a
model Microsoft is hoping to replicate.
Digging up cash
The numbers show why. Overture contributes heavily to the bottom line
of MSN, which receives revenue from the search service in return for exposure
on the portal's site. Although Microsoft doesn't break out these figures,
MSN executives have compared them in scale with Overture's contribution
to Yahoo, which amounted to $54 million last quarter, or 20 percent of
its total revenue.
At the same time, while commercial search pays the
bills, algorithmic search keeps the customer happy. MSN has deals with
Inktomi and LookSmart to power its Web search results, though the future
of its deal with Inktomi has been questionable since Yahoo acquired the
company late last year.
"At this point, we are interested in developing
the technology in-house," MSN group product manager Lisa Gurry said
in an interview last week.
If Microsoft holds true to form, signs of its custom
search engine will soon proliferate. As the company proved with browsers,
media players and so many other products, it has myriad distribution points
at its disposal and can exploit them at will to increase usage and market
share. Already, sources close to the company say that it plans to incorporate
a search toolbar into the Internet Explorer browser that will use MSN's
new engine.
Still, for all its resources and influence, Microsoft
has yet to find a runaway winner in consumer services--and, in fact, continues
to suffer from the failures of its last high-profile initiative launched
three years ago. A planned consumer-oriented Web service, called .Net
My Services, was eventually shelved because of market confusion, a lack
of partners and other factors.
This time, some industry veterans believe, Microsoft
may finally have learned the painful lessons of its many miscalculations
on Web-related businesses, which date back to the early 1990s when the
software giant initially failed to grasp the significance of the Internet
as a whole.
"They are not going to make the same mistake twice.
They are going to cover all the bases and make sure they have a play in
every piece of the Internet," said Laura Didio, an analyst at The
Yankee Group.
"They do not like coming in second."
Article
|